🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.