🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.